In January, a law banning diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) trainings and programs on public college campuses was fast-tracked in Utah by Republican lawmakers. This law, signed by Utah Gov. Spencer Cox, was enacted just two weeks after its introduction, making it one of the most comprehensive bans in the country. This trend of legislative actions against DEI programming in colleges has been observed in at least a dozen states since the beginning of 2023, as reported by The Chronicle of Higher Education.
At the State Higher Education Executive Officers Association’s annual policy conference, college leaders shared their concerns about the impact of these DEI bans. On one hand, colleges face the risk of losing state funding if they defy legislation that restricts DEI programs. Opponents of these programs argue that they create divisions among students and employees and infringe on free speech. However, college officials emphasize the role of these programs in enhancing student achievement.
Geoffrey Landward, the commissioner at the Utah System of Higher Education, highlighted the importance of building relationships with lawmakers to navigate these challenges successfully. He noted that collaboration between university leaders and governing boards with lawmakers is crucial for addressing policy issues effectively. Landward stressed the significance of being actively involved in policy discussions to shape outcomes that benefit colleges.
While most anti-DEI bills have been introduced by Republican lawmakers in GOP-led states, there are internal divisions within conservative movements regarding higher education approaches. TJ Bliss, the Idaho State Board of Education’s chief academic officer, mentioned conflicting language in Idaho’s Republican Party platform regarding higher education. This ambiguity allows higher education officials to advocate for the value of student success programs amid legislative uncertainties.
In Iowa, Rachel Boone, the Iowa Board of Regents’ chief academic officer, faced a challenging situation when legislators added a broad DEI ban to the state budget. Boone emphasized the need for open dialogues with lawmakers to address concerns and find solutions that support student success initiatives. By engaging in constructive conversations, colleges can navigate legislative changes while upholding their commitment to student welfare.
A common critique of legislative proposals targeting DEI programs is their broad language, which can create confusion among college staff regarding compliance. Geoffrey Landward cautioned against exploiting technical loopholes in legislation, as this could jeopardize colleges’ credibility and funding. Instead, he advocated for a transparent and honest approach to implementing new mandates, focusing on maintaining student access and success programs.
In response to legislative changes, colleges can propose alternative solutions that align with lawmakers’ objectives while safeguarding essential student support services. By engaging proactively with legislators, colleges can influence policy decisions that prioritize student welfare and academic success. Rachel Boone emphasized the importance of collaborating with lawmakers to address concerns without resorting to stringent legislation, promoting a cooperative approach to higher education governance.
